Glappy InsightsThe library · AI · Network · Security · Infrastructure · Government

Insights

Field notes on the consequences of AI: for the network, the security team, the data center and the people who answer for it. The questions worth asking before they’re obvious, with the evidence and our view.

13Pieces on the shelf
13Live on LinkedIn
1Field guide
01 OctLast added

The library

Every piece Glappy publishes lands here, filed by month and year. Articles and field guides open on glappy.com; LinkedIn notes open on LinkedIn.

6 of 13 pieces · Security

30 Sep4 min read

ArticleSecurityAI

Shadow AI is a procurement failure, not a discipline problem

Picture your best analyst at 9:40 p.m., finishing tomorrow’s report on an AI tool she pays for herself. Banning it doesn’t stop it. It just hides it.

Evidence: Deloitte UK GenAI Workforce Survey 2026, n=25,000 (31% of GenAI users use it without their employer’s knowledge)

27 Sep8 min read

ArticleAISecurity

The person who bought the AI shouldn’t be the one who says it worked

Boards say they can’t see whether AI is paying off. The fix isn’t a better dashboard. It’s a different person holding the pen, and ten questions they should ask before the next renewal.

Evidence: PwC Directors Survey 2026 · EY AI Risk & Governance 2026 · Atlassian

+ 30s videoRead →
27 Sep12-page PDF

Field guideAISecurity

Bought ≠ Proven: The AI Proof-of-Value Scorecard

Glappy Field Guide #1. Score any AI tool, pilot or agent in 45 minutes: the 10-line scorecard, what counts as evidence, a 30-day proof plan, a renewal gate checklist and a one-page board template.

Evidence: 12 pages · PDF · free with work email

Free · work emailGet the guide →
6